The Risk in Hedge Funds as a Portfolio Hedge

Yesterday, one of our favorite bloggers, Josh Brown over at The Reformed Broker, took to the defense of the hedge fund industry after one of our favorite writers Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone fired a shot across the bow earlier in the week. While Taibbi says hedge funds “suck at investing” because they are all underperforming the S&P this year, Brown argues the point that most people turn to hedge funds for risk-adjusted return (or, at least, they should). It’s not about out-performing a rallying stock market, but (hopefully) earning a respectable return (and a better risk-adjusted return) whether the market goes up or down.

For Brown, while many hedge funds will tout alpha as a major selling point, at the end of the day, most of them simply sacrifice some upside volatility with the intention of avoiding a great deal of downside volatility, too.  Josh goes on to say that there are “some hedge fund managers who are simply beta+leverage” (meaning leveraged bets on the stock market), but that most managers are not chasing Apple or the stock market in general, instead doing other things like “volatility, credit arb, emerging markets, commodities, and on and on”.  (C’mon Josh, you couldn’t give us some managed futures love?)

So we have Taibbi on one side essentially asking why we are paying hedge funds managers millions to just chase the stock market, and Brown on the other saying – hold on, only some chase it, and even those who chase it do so in a way that the results can definitely be something less (in terms of returns and risk) than the stock market.

We’re left thinking they both miss the point, which is a little more nuanced than perhaps either of their audiences want to consider. You see, while hedge funds are doing a lot of different things and not trying to simply beat the market (props Josh Brown), one need only look at 2008 and the severe losses seen by most hedge fund categories to give merit to the idea that many are chasing the stock market (props Matt Taibbi).

The nuanced point is that no matter what hedge funds try and do to provide, as Josh Brown put it,  “an alternative for wealthy investors so that even in tough times, they have someone who can play the short side or find other ways to make money when stocks aren’t rising,” the recent proof in the pudding of 2008 showed that they are still tied to the stock market. Why? It’s complicated, but the quick and easy reasons are because they rely on access to credit just like the companies in the stock market, and that many (even those doing arbitrage or similar) are betting on the success or failure of companies which succeed or fail in sync with the economy (much like the stock market).

So, in our opinion, they are both sort of right, and both sort of wrong.  As you can see below – Brown’s defense is more applicable to some corners of the hedge fund world than others (hint: managed futures), while Taibbi’s argument was more applicable to some categories in 2008 than others (mainly emerging markets and equity neutral).

* Source: Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Indices (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.)

At the end of the day, whether hedge funds outperformed stocks this year may be missing the point. While we don’t know what the next crisis will bring, 2008 at least showed us that not all hedge fund categories are made of the same stuff when it comes to crisis period performance – and that’s the time investors are likely looking for hedge funds to do their job.  So, we’ll disagree with Taibbi and say that hedge funds are a better equity play than just investing in the stock market (on a risk adjusted basis), but also realize that when it comes to providing cover in a storm – it’s safe to say that most hedge funds are not the magic bullet investors are looking for.

One comment

  1. […] Hedge funds are no panacea in a bear market.  (Attain Capital) […]

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.