PFGBest Update: Good News for 30.7 Accounts

After receiving what feels like the 1,000th call from groups buying PFG claims, the trustee’s motion for 30.7 account holders’ money to be treated the as an individual class was approved today by the judge in the PFG case. What does it mean for recovery totals?

Well for one, it means that 30.7 account holders are likely to see almost all of their money, and possibly even 100% of it. For other account holders, it’s a bit more complicated. We have been poring over the PFG balance sheet reported by the trustee – in addition to getting on several calls with the trustee to clarify some points – and after all of that we have come up with the potential recovery levels below based on the assets on hand (i.e not including any additional money received by the estate via class action suits).

We’ve listed the best case recovery scenario at the top – where essentially all of the assets would end up benefiting customer’s 4d balances – and then using the balance sheet and items listed within to calculate how much less 4d customers would recover based on possible outcomes. We then do the same for 30.7 balances, although there are really just two outcomes there – it remains separate, or is combined with 4d and the 4d percentages apply (although slightly higher as the 30.7 balances would be added).

For 4d Balances

If all possible sources go to 4d accounts: 58.37%

Possible Complications:

  • If legal fees double: -1.31%
  • If FX & Metals succeed in getting priority for their funds: -9.49%
  • If 4d customers don’t get priority over the estate: -2.76%
  • If banks succeed in keeping set offs: -6.10%

Our Prediction:

  • FX & Metals don’t get priority
  • Legal fees remain at current pace
  • 4d given priority claim over estate
  • Banks succeed in retaining 50% of set offs

Result: 55.08% recovery

Best Case Scenario: 58.37%

Worst Case Scenario: 43.73%

*#4 & Worst Case assumes customers receive 44% of general estate (less $500k in creditor liabilities, $400k in customer payables)

A couple of things to note:

1. This is all an exercise in estimation and prediction – two highly unreliable fields, and as such should not be taken as official, legal, or any other such. It’s our best guess at this moment, that’s all, meaning the “worst case” scenarios above could still be worse than what we’ve listed.

2.  None of this includes potential recoveries via class action lawsuits, whose success is far from certain. This could substantially add to the recoverable amount if successful against the large banks.  Nor does it include the possibility of “finding” some of the stolen money, however remote. This is only based on money the trustee knows to exist and either has under his control or is working to get under his control.

And what about JP Morgan and the other banks’ efforts to keep the money they claim as a set off? JP Morgan has about $18 million of PFG customer money under dispute saying it is subject to set offs.  We don’t think this should be a very difficult question – after all, they are getting billions of dollars per year from federal handouts… this money is little more than a rounding error to them. Today JP Morgan settled with the MF Global trustee to relinquish their claim over customer funds, and would be nice to see them do the same for PFG customers, too.

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.