The Field Guide to Surviving Volatility

Our friend Jeffrey Dow Jones (yes, that’s his real name) over at the Cognitive Concord Blog was out with the above titled post last week, and it couldn’t be more timely in our opinion.  His four point ‘field guide’ has the following items:

1. Buy Insurance

2. Hold Cash

3. Own things that go up in value when it gets volatile.

4. Size trades based on volatility

Now, we’re biased of course – but we couldn’t help but think managed futures fit perfectly with this approach.  We’ll start with guide item #3, “Own things that go up in value when it gets volatile”. We’ve covered here, and here, and here how managed futures is a ‘long volatility’ investment, meaning it is designed to do well during periods of increased directional volatility. Need some proof… how about plotting the DJCS Managed Futures Index against the S&P 500 over the past 6 market crisis periods.

Crisis Peroid

(Past performance is no necessarily indicative to future results)
Managed Futures = DJCS Managed Futures Index
U.S. Stocks = S&P 500 Total Return *from Jun 1994 to June 2013

How do managed futures do it? They aren’t magic. They do it by entering nearly every breakout to new high or low prices in various markets, losing on 60% to 70% of those as they prove to be false breakouts, and then capturing outlier profits on the remaining 30% to 40% which keep going in a volatile move one way or the other. Sounds like just the kind of “thing” Mr. Dow Jones was thinking of (although he mentions US Treasuries and the Japanese Yen, not managed futures).

As for #1 – buying insurance – we don’t see how that is very much different than #3 – as insurance is something you can own which will go up in value. Of course, you could buy insurance for a lot cheaper than you could invest in something, which is perhaps why Mr. Dow Jones lists them as two separate items.  Our problem with using insurance as a hedge or way to ‘survive’ volatility is that insurance is a wasting asset (it only lasts for a finite time) – versus something you own being with you until you sell it – which will, by definition, result in a loss if the insured event doesn’t come to pass.

And here’s where managed futures as a hedge/diversifier really shines. You see, an investment which goes up during volatility spikes won’t necessarily go down when volatility isn’t spiking. That whole non correlated not equaling negatively correlated thing (see the bottom of this newsletter for more on that). If you take a look at the chart above and focus in on the far right columns – you can see this play out in actual data with managed futures having been that rare type of insurance over the past 19 years, the free kind.  If you plotted S&P 500 puts as insurance in the same manner, the average 12 month performance would be severely negative, but here we have managed futures generating positive returns while also providing protection. Not too shabby. (past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results).

How do managed futures mesh with holding cash?  Well, the bulk of money allocated to a managed futures program is typically held in cash, and the ability of notional funding in futures accounts allows for all sorts of portable alpha plays with your cash allocation (although you start to go away from the purpose of holding cash if your cash isn’t acting like cash.

Finally – Mr. Dow Jones mentions sizing your trades for volatility.

“All you have to do beforehand is derive some kind of formula for how large to size your trades.  Here’s a quick ‘n dirty example that I came up with, based on a somewhat-standard version that the industry uses:

Trade Size (# of shares) =  P * [Portfolio Size / Asset Volatility]  / Share Price

Where P is a constant that determines the baseline percentage the trade should represent for of the total portfolio.

In layman’s terms, all that formula says is that when it gets more volatile, you trade smaller.  But it’s remarkable how few people actually do this…  ”

Volatility based trade sizing! Now you’re really talking the language of managed futures.  The basic building block of most managed futures programs just happens to be adaptive trade sizing based on the initial (volatility based) risk.  This is also part of the reason managed futures can have lumpy returns and do well in times of rising volatility, as they initially size their positions off of low volatility when markets break out of a trading range.

Head on over to Cognitive Concord for the full read, but just remember to read (managed futures) between the lines.

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.