Metals, Crude, Unfazed by Presidents and Chinese Economy

Is it just us, or is everyone talking politics these days amidst the US conventions and upcoming election. While data journalists will tell you that it’s all relative when debating whether the economy will be better under a Democrat or Republican, we’re starting to see more and more articles predicting what commodity/financials/currency markets will do in the wake of the 2016 election.  The fervor has even gotten down to the rarely traded Mexican Peso:

We already asked if Presidential elections are good for Managed Futures, but what about Crude Oil and the metal markets? When we’re looking for that kind of commentary, we turn to none other than oil and metals specialist – Jaguar Investments Limited. Here’s their take on price changes in Copper and Crude Oil from three months before the election to the end of the election cycle (the ‘End Nov’ column) and the change for the three months after the election (the ‘End Feb’ column).

Presidential Cycle Metals Crude

Although it covers over thirty years, a sample size of nine elections is still ridiculously small – and it should come as no surprise that there is no clear pattern. The only [potential] pattern [seen] was that in the three months leading up to the election, the copper price alternates on election cycles. I also looked at the effect of different scenarios, i.e. Democrat victory, Republican victory, first-term President etc. and the only conclusion I could draw from that was that copper tends to fall in the three months after a new (not second-term) President. Since the sample size of occurrence is five occasions in the last thirty-six years I’m not sure I’d want to risk a dollar on that trade.

Turns out metals dance to the beat of their own drum, not one of either party. But Jaguar doesn’t stop there. You have to mention China if trading in commodities, especially Copper; and Jaguar’s research note looks at  the correlations between  Copper, Crude Oil, and the Chinese stock market.

China Copper Crude Correlation_1

The significant bull-market that peaked in early 2008 certainly coincided with bull markets in both copper and crude oil over the same period (indeed as Graph.3 above shows, copper and oil were leading indicators of stock market strength). But as Graph.3 also shows, neither copper or oil have shown any real affinity for the SCI since the crash in late 2008. Interestingly the one thing the graph does show clearly is how artificially high commodity prices were kept (dollar-denominated) as a result of the extraordinary quantitative easing by global central banks from 2008 to 2015. Once the markets began to price in the end of QE (at least in the US) then prices plummeted back to where they should have been all along [relative to the Shanghai].

Further and clearer evidence of these low (non?) correlations can be seen in Graph.4 below;

China Copper Crude Correlation_2

[Here are the correlations of the Chinese Renminbi to Copper and Crude]:

Renminbi Crude Copper Correlation

The disappointing issue with this indicator, however, is that although the correlations are high from January 2014, if we take the data back to July 2010 (when the second peg was abandoned), the correlation falls to just 25% and 14% respectively – i.e. not tradeable.

So they put out a research note showing no real zingers? You got it – and we think that’s their point – that sometimes the real news is to ignore the news.  That sometimes the sky is falling metaphor is just that… a metaphor.  As Jaguar puts it:

Neither Brexit, nor US Presidential elections, nor female leadership, nor the Chinese economy or Chinese stock market give us any clue as to where the prices of copper and oil may go next.

Although, if you press them for a prediction….

 ….over the last two years, there has been a relatively high correlation between the prices of these commodities and the Renminbi and so perhaps it would be prudent to keep an eye on that for future guidance. Although the PBOC is trying to manage currency volatility, there does not seem to be any meaningful attempt to stop the slide. Against a backdrop of expected economic weakness in the second half of 2016, the consensus seems to be that it will continue to slide through 6.70 and ultimately towards 6.90. This would imply copper and oil prices moving towards $7000+ and $80+ respectively. But I’ve been wrong before…

But in the end, while they consider all of the above – Jaguar isn’t in the business of making big directional bets on these markets. Their specialty is trying to capture short to medium term spread and arbitrage opportunities in metals and the energy complex. That means they are more interested in seeing what their contacts at physical dealers are looking at and planning than how the Chinese stock market is doing. Even so, it never hurts to know all sides of your particular slice of the market.

For more information on Jaguar Investments check out:

Alternative Analysis: Jaguar Investments Limited

25 Questions Every Investor Should Know About Jaguar Investments Limited



Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.