Russell 2000 Futures Back at CME

While it seems the CME is the dominant player in futures in the US, ICE has been coming along as a competitor in the quest for global dominance as the top futures exchange. Most people immediately jump to a look at volumes in  WTI Crude Oil (CME Product) and Brent (ICE product) as a proxy for how each exchange is doing in markets they compete in.

But the other competition between the two exchanges is who has the rights to the family of Russell Indices. It first started with the CME. Then in 2007, it went to ICE. Now, the CME won the licensing back with new contracts launched in April. That meant the CME and the ICE had competing contracts until the rest of the ICE contracts expired. For the first time in 2017, there were more Russell 2000 Futures contracts traded and held on the CME than on the ICE.  Futures are an all or nothing product, meaning traders want to be where all the other traders are – and you can see the large jumps in CME volumes as we approached the switchover point:

Emini Russell Volume and Open Interest

Russell 2000 Index Futures Cumulative Roll Volume

Here’s a little bit of history around the licensing switches via Futures magazine:

Back around 2002, the Russell family of indexes launched an innovative project where they would license its indexes on a non-exclusive basis to any exchange willing to pay a fee. Several exchanges jumped at the chance. One of the issues for Russell, at the time, was that although the CME had made a huge success of the Russell 2000, its broad market benchmark Russell 1000 was not doing much volume there. This despite that the fact that more financial entities actually used the Russell 1000 as a benchmark for broad market performance than the S&P 500. The two indexes were highly correlated, approximately 99%, so it didn’t make much sense for a trader — even one who used the 1000 as a benchmark — to utilize the futures product to hedge when the S&P 500 was so liquid.

While several exchanges jumped at the opportunity to list futures on its products, the liquidity remained with the CME. But in 2007, when the CME was doing battle with ICE with competing bids for the Chicago Board of Trade, Russell saw an opportunity. It still felt that the Russell 1000 futures was a viable product and needed to be promoted by an exchange not conflicted, so when the most recent license ran out, ICE and Russell entered into an exclusive arrangement for ICE to list the 2000. This was a huge boost to ICE, which up to that point was not considered a serious threat to CME’s bid, but this move would leave a mark.

For professional retail traders, alike, this move is potentially a cost saver.

When the Russell returns to Globex, traders will enjoy a 70% margin offset against the S&P 500 and a 65% margin offset against the Dow and Nasdaq 100 contracts, according to McCourt, who adds, “We are very excited to bring this contract back within the liquidity pool at CME to trade alongside other major U.S. equity index benchmarks. It will put those indices on a common 24-hour platform and also introduce capital efficiencies.”

Professional trader Morad Askar of FuturesTrader71.com is happy to see the move. “I didn’t like it when it went to ICE in 2007,” Askar says. “As a CME member I was trading at membership rates and it [offered margin offsets] with other index products. When it went to ICE it became a lot more expensive.”

While member rates and margin offsets are a big draw, Askar says that the data fees are also less expensive for retail traders — many of the customers of his educational services — on CME than ICE.  “For someone who is a non-professional it is $5 a month; it is not $110, which is what ICE is charging for real-time data. For the average prop guy it doesn’t matter, just a couple of points on the E-mini S&P 500, but for people who want to come into the industry, it adds up.”

For traders that haven’t already made the switch, or those interested in the Russell 2000 family contracts. You can find more information on the contract switches from the CME here.

 

 

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.