Let’s start with a confession: every asset in your portfolio pays you in two different currencies.
The first is returns. The boring, spreadsheet kind. The kind your CPA cares about.
The second is feelings. The dopamine drip. The “honey, look what NVDA did today” kind. The kind that makes you screenshot your brokerage app and text it to the group chip.
Stocks pay you in both. On a variable schedule that would make a Vegas slot machine designer blush.
True diversifiers like managed futures? They mostly pay you in just one. And they pay it on a schedule that, most of the time, feels like absolutely nothing at all.
This is the problem. Possibly the problem. And nobody on CNBC is going to tell you about it…
The Variable Reward Machine, Explained
B.F. Skinner figured this out with pigeons in the 1950s. Give a pigeon a pellet every time it pecks a button, and it’ll peck calmly. Give it a pellet on a random schedule, and the pigeon will peck that button until its little pigeon brain melts.
Equities are the random pellet machine. Consider what they offer you on a daily basis:
- Constant narrative engagement. Earnings season, Fed days, jobs reports, geopolitics, a CEO tweeting at 2am, an activist investor writing a 47-page deck about why a snack food company should spin off its pretzel division.
- Intermittent emotional payoffs. The rip day. The fresh all-time high. The “I told you so” moment when your brother-in-law’s stock picks craters and yours doesn’t.
- A ticker that lights up your phone. Green candles. Red candles. A push notification at 9:31am EST telling you something important is happening right now.
It’s a slot machine. That occasionally pays your rent. And sometimes pays for the boat.
This is, neurologically speaking, an absolute banger of a product. It’s the reason people who would never describe themselves as gamblers will absolutely refresh Robinhood 40 times during a Tuesday lunch.
What Real Alts Don’t Have
Now let’s talk about your friendly neighborhood managed futures fund. Or your trend follower. Or your global macro shop. Or your tail risk hedge.
Here’s their pitch deck, emotionally speaking:
- No charisma. Nobody is doing a keynote at a conference about how a CTA “changed the world.”
- No founder cult. There is no Elon of trend following. (Sorry, Dunn. Sorry, Mulvaney. You’re great. You don’t have 80 million Twitter followers.)
- No daily narrative arc. Nobody on financial TV is breathlessly explaining why the soybean/yen carry trade is up 0.4% today.
- No ticker that lights up your phone. Most of these strategies report monthly. Monthly. In an attention economy that measures things in seconds, monthly might as well be carved on a stone tablet.
What they offer instead is a return stream that zigs when equities zag. Usually quietly. Sometimes violently. And almost never on a schedule that aligns with when you most want validation.
It’s the Boba Fett of your portfolio. Doesn’t say much. Doesn’t need to. Shows up exactly once, at exactly the right moment, and gets the job done. (We’re going to politely ignore the Sarlacc Pit incident. Different blog post…)
The Behavioral Asymmetry (a.k.a. Why You’re Going to Sell at the Worst Possible Time)
Here is the cruelest part of owning diversifiers. And I want you to really sit with this one because it’s the whole ballgame.
When stocks rip and your diversifier sits flat, the regret is loud and immediate.
You see it every day. You see it on every statement.You see it when your buddy’s all-equity portfolio is up 28% and yours is up 14% because your portfolio was built to survive full market cycles, not just bull runs. The regret compounds with the S&P. It shows up at dinner parties. It shows up in your brain at 3am.
When stocks crash and your diversifier saves you, the gratitude is quiet and slow.
You don’t really notice it. You notice that your portfolio is down less than it could have been. There’s no ticker tape parade for “drawdown that didn’t happen.” Nobody high-fives you for “the Sortino ratio you preserved.” Your spouse does not say “thank god we owned that 10% sleeve of trend following” while you’re eating cereal in March 2020.
Quick translation: Sortino ratio is just the Sharpe ratio’s pickier cousin. Sharpe punishes you for all volatility, up and down. Sortino only punishes you for the bad kind. Because, let’s be honest, nobody complains about upside volatility.
The pain and pleasure asymmetry is literally built into the calendar. Bull markets last years. Crashes last weeks. You spend 80% of your investing life feeling slightly stupid for owning the diversifier, and maybe 20% feeling vindicated. And in that 20%, the vindication is muted because, hey, your stocks are still down too.
This is why investors consistently sell their diversifiers at exactly the wrong moment. It’s not because they’re dumb. It’s because they’re human. You can’t out-spreadsheet a few million years of evolutionary wiring that says “do more of the thing that gives you the pellet, less of the thing that doesn’t.”
This is also why you keep seeing the same headline every cycle: “Trend Following Is Dead.” It’s never dead. It’s just done its job quietly while everyone was watching the slot machine.
The Cersei Lannister Problem
Quick Game of Thrones detour, because we have to.
Remember when Cersei refused to send her armies north to fight the White Walkers? Her logic was airtight in the short term: “Why would I weaken myself fighting a problem I can’t see?”
She was right. Right up until she was extremely, catastrophically wrong.
Holding diversifiers is the opposite of being Cersei. It’s keeping a portion of your army in reserve specifically for the threat you can’t see yet. The threat that doesn’t exist on the ticker today. The threat that absolutely will exist someday, because it always does.
The problem is that for most of the show, the army you’ve kept in reserve looks like it’s doing nothing. It looks expensive. It looks unnecessary. Until winter actually comes.
So What Do You Actually Do With This?
A few things, in no particular order, all of them annoyingly unsexy:
- Size your diversifiers like you mean it. A 2% sleeve of managed futures isn’t diversification, it’s decoration. If the goal is to actually move the needle in a crisis, you need a meaningful allocation. The math doesn’t care about your comfort level.
- Judge them on the right scoreboard. Comparing a trend follower to the S&P during a bull market is like comparing a fire extinguisher to a toaster because neither one is making you breakfast. Different jobs.
- Pre-commit. Decide your allocation rules when you’re calm. Write them down. Because the version of you that’s watching equities rip in month 18 of a bull market is not the version of you who should be making allocation decisions.
- Embrace the boredom. If a part of your portfolio is constantly entertaining, that part is probably not diversifying anything. The boring parts are doing the work.
The Takeaway
The trades that pay the most over a full cycle are often the ones that reward you the least along the way.
They don’t text you. They don’t celebrate with you. They don’t show up on Bloomberg with a chyron about their amazing quarter. They just sit there, doing their unglamorous job, waiting for the moment when the slot machine stops paying.
If your portfolio feels great every single quarter, you probably don’t own enough of the stuff that’s actually doing the diversifying work.
The hardest trade isn’t picking the next 10-bagger. It’s holding the thing that doesn’t hug you back, long enough for it to do what you hired it to do.
Now go check on your fire extinguisher.
Links:
