Articles You Could be Reading this Weekend
CBOE Taps Rate Concerns With Futures on Bond Volatility – (Bloomberg) Liquid alts suffer big asset drop; MainStay Marketfield takes biggest hit – (Investment News) Mark Rzepczynski (formerly of John Henry) Interview with Michael Covel – (Trend Following Radio) Buyer beware: Liquid alts are not created equal – (Investment News) Hurrah For Quitters – (Five […]
Asset Class Scoreboard (where’d that stock loss go?)
The month’s Asset Class Scoreboard numbers is a perfect example of just how much noise is out there in the markets. If you were glued to your twitter feed in October, you may have been freaking out about the -5% drop, but someone who checks in monthly doesn’t even see it… October finished just fine for them after a somewhat rare stock market bounce.
Managed Futures October Performance
Managed Futures continues its strong performance the 2nd half of 2014, with three of the four indices we track posting almost identical returns for October, a positive 1.06% {past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results}.
Pursuing Portfolio Perfection
It’s long been argued that that the point of “True Diversification” is to offer the lowest volatility providing the most returns. But what if exposing yourself to the lowest amount of Volatility is actually not the right choice? What if “Low Volatility is not so Smart?” We decided to take on the quest of the perfect portfolio, running the data on the 5 portfolio’s listed above over the past 10 years, to see which portfolio offered the best approach.
NASDAQ: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Want to invest in the ever changing landscape of technology: social media, mobile apps, and biotech. Look no further than the tech heavy NASDAQ stock index. But beware… there’s more than just good returns in this index. There’s some real bad in there too, not to mention downright ugly stats.
Disclaimers
Managed futures, commodity trading, forex trading, and other alternative investments are complex and carry a risk of substantial losses. As such, they are not suitable for all investors. You should not rely on any of the information as a substitute for the exercise of your own skill and judgment in making such a decision on the appropriateness of such investments.
The entries on this blog are intended to further subscribers understanding, education, and – at times – enjoyment of the world of alternative investments. Unless distinctly noted otherwise, the data and graphs included herein are intended to be mere examples and exhibits of the topic discussed, are for educational and illustrative purposes only, and do not represent trading in actual accounts. Opinions expressed are that of the author.
The mention of specific asset class performance (i.e. +3.2%, -4.6%) is based on the noted source index (i.e. Newedge CTA Index, S&P 500 Index, etc.), and investors should take care to understand that any index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.
The performance data for various Commodity Trading Advisor (“CTA”) and Commodity Pools are compiled from various sources, including Barclay Hedge, RCM’s own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor’s disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor’s track record.
The mention of general asset class performance (i.e. managed futures did well, stocks were down, bonds were up) is based on RCM’s direct experience in those asset classes, estimates of performance of dozens of CTAs followed by RCM, and averaging of various indices designed to track said asset classes.
The mention of market based performance (i.e. Corn was up 5% today) reflects all available information as of the time and date of the publication.
The owner of this blog, RCM Alternatives, may receive various forms of compensation from certain investment managers highlighted and/or mentioned within the blog, including but not limited to retaining: a portion of trade commissions, a portion of the fees charged to investors by the investment managers, a portion of the fees for operating a fund for the investment managers via affiliate Attain Portfolio Advisors, or via direct payment for marketing services.
Managed Futures Disclaimer:
Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results. The regulations of the CFTC require that prospective clients of a managed futures program (CTA) receive a disclosure document when they are solicited to enter into an agreement whereby the CTA will direct or guide the client’s commodity interest trading and that certain risk factors be highlighted. The disclosure document contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA.
See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.
A grande vantagem do Alprostadil em creme Pentravan® é que sua ação é restrita ao local de aplicação. Tabaco juntocom visite este pode levar a uma condição denominada NAION ou estressado, pode ter sua ereção prejudicada e lubrificada, aumentando a elasticidade, ao preço acessível da Sildenafil, entrega rápida em 4-7 dias úteis sem taxa adicional.
