AI in Finance: Deepseek’s Latest Advances Signal Industry Growth

The emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, has raised significant concerns regarding the future of U.S. dominance in the artificial intelligence sector. This development comes at a particularly interesting time, as Mohammad Rasouli, Stanford researcher and CEO of AIx2, recently discussed the state of AI competition on The Derivative.

 

DeepSeek’s Breakthrough

Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek introduced its AI model, DeepSeek-R1, which reportedly operates at a fraction of the cost of leading U.S. models like those from OpenAI and Google. The company claimed to have spent only $5.6 million on computing power, compared to the hundreds of millions spent by U.S. firms.

Rasouli noted that,

“as stated in the paper, this is only the cost of the final training round of the model which is a small fraction of the full development cost. It does not include hardware operating expenses, cost of R&D and data which is estimated at hundreds of millions of USD.”

This efficiency challenge aligns with Rasouli’s podcast discussion of compute resources being a critical “fuel for growth” in AI development.

Performance Claims: The Deepseek model has been described as having capabilities comparable to established AI models, raising questions about the efficiency and scalability of U.S. AI investments.

Rasouli adds,

“Another major development is that the DeepSeek model is open source and available for all to change and use. This will act as a force for the other model providers such as ChatGPT to reduce the price of their models, or even make them freely available in open source mode. We have already seen this impact on ChatGPT pricing of O1 model. This dynamic will increase the speed of innovation and adoption of AI across use cases which means a higher need for compute resources.”


Market Reactions
Stock Market Impact: Following the announcement of DeepSeek’s capabilities, U.S. tech stocks experienced a sharp decline. Nvidia, a leading supplier of AI chips, saw its stock plummet nearly 17%, resulting in a loss of approximately $600 billion in market value, the largest single-day loss for any company.

Investor Sentiment: The initial market reaction was characterized by panic selling, as investors reassessed the competitive landscape of AI. The tech-heavy Nasdaq index fell by 3.1%, while the broader S&P 500 dropped by 1.5%. This volatility reflects what Rasouli described as the rapidly evolving landscape of intelligent investing.

Recovery and Stability: Despite the initial shock, some recovery was noted in the following days, with major indexes like the Dow Jones and S&P 500 showing slight gains.

 

Broader Implications
Concerns Over U.S. Dominance: Analysts expressed that DeepSeek’s advancements could challenge the perception of U.S. superiority in AI technology, particularly as it demonstrates that significant capabilities can be achieved with lower investment.

Future of AI Investments: The situation has prompted discussions about the sustainability of high spending on AI by U.S. companies and whether this spending will yield proportional returns.


Reasons Why the U.S. Shouldn’t Be Worried Technological Infrastructure and Resources:

Superior Hardware: U.S. companies like Nvidia are still leading in the production of advanced AI chips, which are critical for deploying AI models at scale. DeepSeek’s model, while impressive, does not yet match the capabilities of U.S. firms in terms of hardware support.

Investment in R&D: U.S. tech companies have invested billions in research and development, creating a robust ecosystem that supports innovation and advancement in AI technologies. This foundational investment provides a significant competitive edge.

Rasouli emphasized,

“The main message of the DeepSeek is that the compute resources can be used more efficiently, which does not mean we need less compute in the future, rather it means with limited compute resources we have we can now do even more. Such breakthroughs in AI to improve the efficiency of data and computation have been completely expected and many instances of them have happened in the past. Interestingly data and compute are hand in hand as computational resources are used for generating synthetic data for the models.”

Market Adaptability:
Response to Competition: The U.S. tech sector has a history of adapting quickly to competitive pressures. Analysts believe that the advancements made by DeepSeek will prompt U.S. companies to enhance their own models and improve efficiency, ultimately benefiting the market as a whole.

Open Source Advantage: While DeepSeek’s models are open-source, U.S. companies can also adopt and integrate new techniques and insights from these developments into their existing frameworks, maintaining their competitive edge.

 

Quality and Trust:
Data Security and Privacy: Concerns about data privacy and security with DeepSeek’s models, particularly regarding data storage in China, may deter U.S. companies from adopting these technologies. U.S. firms are often preferred for their stringent data protection measures.

Established Reputation: Companies like OpenAI and Google have established reputations for reliability and safety in AI applications, which may lead businesses to continue relying on these trusted sources rather than switching to newer, less proven competitors.

Long-Term Perspective:
Incremental Advances: Experts suggest that DeepSeek’s advancements are more about incremental improvements rather than groundbreaking innovations. This means that while they may pose a challenge, they are unlikely to fundamentally disrupt the market.

Focus on Deployment: The U.S. still holds a significant advantage in deploying AI technologies effectively. The ability to leverage vast amounts of data and integrate AI into various applications is a critical factor that DeepSeek has yet to match.
 

Conclusion
While DeepSeek’s rise has caused some initial concern, the U.S. maintains several advantages that suggest it can continue to lead in the AI space. The combination of superior infrastructure, adaptability, trust, and a long-term perspective on innovation positions the U.S. well against emerging competitors.

This integrated approach provides both breaking news about DeepSeek and expert context from Rasouli’s recent discussion, offering readers a more comprehensive understanding of the situation’s implications for the AI industry.

Check out Mohammad on The Derivative: The State of AI, and AI in Alternative Investments with Mohammad Rasouli of AIx2

 

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

logo