Apple’s surge and descent became a fixture of the financial commentariat over the last couple of years. It was tough to make it a full day without hearing some discussion of the company’s stock price, products, or plans for the future (we even got in on the act here, here, and here). Now a piece from CNN Money has been making the rounds, detailing the rise and fall of a hedge fund/investing advice newsletter run by someone named Andy Zaky. His “hedge fund” – if you can call it that – made its rise and fall entirely through investments in the Cupertino company (can we call it a Hedge Apple Fund?), and the lurid details are enough to make even Josh Brown wince.
It’s tempting to just shake our heads in pity for the folks who were burned by this “expert” advice and move on, but reading the article it becomes clear that the mistakes in this case are the same ones that we run into over and over again with investors everywhere – even in managed futures. We think it’s worth taking the time to pick over the coroner’s report here and identify some of the bright red warning flags that should have sent investors running for their lives.
Know Your Exit
Getting into a trade is the easy part. Exiting before the music stops and the chairs are all gone is what separates the legends from the paupers. In the waning months, Zaky’s fund was evidently doing little or nothing to hedge against the possibility that his aggressive options trading strategy might go wrong. Granted, he was going long and short with his Apple positions, but the fund experienced troubling losses in March of 2012 that should have set alarm bells ringing.
Track Records Matter
There’s a reason why people want to see a solid record of performance before they invest – they want to know that a manager is more than just a flash in the pan. It’s why we don’t include managers for consideration until they have 36 months of performance data for us to review. And when it came to Zaky, a few right calls on Apple in a newsletter is no substitute for a track record. It can’t give you a sense of what happened between his calls: did he panic when it went down before going up? A track record is a vital source of information about a manger – and a newsletter service isn’t remotely the same as managing client money and going through all of the emotional and logistical stress that comes along with that. You can’t know whether his calls were dumb luck or skill.
As Nassim Taleb (among others) has pointed out – the skill of this guy’s 5 for 5 picks on Apple could have been nothing more than luck. With hundreds (or perhaps thousands) of people throwing out Apple price predictions, some of them were bound to be right, much like the proverbial dart-throwing monkey. Without a sufficient track record, that’s the chance you’re taking.
Greed Kills
At one point, the article estimates Zaky’s fund was up nearly 400%, before plummeting to a loss of nearly -93%. That’s not a -93% drawdown from the peak, either (which would equate to something like a -65% to -70% loss) but a 93% loss from the starting equity:
Whether it was his ego getting in the way or the intoxicating effect of a hot streak, the fund kept trying to hit a home run on every swing. In effect, his options strategy represented huge hidden leverage – and no matter how talented you are, no one can keep up a perfect record forever.
Setting a Line in the Sand
Most traders have some kind of line in the sand, a point at which they will simply walk away from a trade gone bad, no matter how smart it seemed in the beginning. This is always the risk of going with a discretionary money manager… there’s a chance they’ll get married to a particular trade, refuse to get out while it’s still possible, and go down with the ship.
We saw this a couple of years ago with Dighton Capital’s bet on the Swiss Franc. They remained in the trade (and in fact, doubled down) as the losses piled up. The thing is, even is the manager is proven right eventually (as Dighton was, and Zaky very well could be), being right doesn’t help you if you’re wiped out before you get there.
Style Drift
By the author’s estimation, Zaky wasn’t even following his own advice when it came to his Apple investments. His original advice had been steeped in caution, his newsletter emphasizing his belief in minimizing risk. But after a couple of stumbles in the fund, whatever caution had originally been there apparently vanished.
The problem here, of course, is that style drift is notoriously difficult to identify with a hedge fund. Fortunately, there are warning signs that due diligence can watch out for with CTAs to alert investors when a manager is no longer sticking with the strategy that they once did. Simply put, when a manager stops following their own advice, it’s probably a good time to locate and secure your emergency flotation device.
It’s sad to see people lose their retirement funds or their livelihoods on blowups like this, but at least when it happens to someone else, it gives us a chance to learn from their mistakes. And in most cases, we find that the post-mortem analysis reveals the exact dangers we warn about and watch for on a regular basis.
Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.
The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.
Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.
Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.
Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.
Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.
RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.
Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings
The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.