Hedge Fund Best Practices

If you’re an advisor or manager, it might be worth your time to check out a new whitepaper out from CalALTs (formerly California Hedge Fund Association) titled, “Best Practices. Hedge Fund and Private Equity Operations” in conjunction with their AltsLA conference. The research dives into the complexity of the Prime Broker relationship for hedge funds. For futures firms, it’s simple enough to sub in FCM’s or clearing firms for futures firms.

If you ignore the redundancy of the word “continue,” the takeaway line that stuck with us, is:

 “Continued management of these relationships…. will continue to be imperative.”

This is a full time job. We know. We do it full time for dozens of hedge funds, mutual funds, and family office clients (see here to learn how funds can ‘outsource’ this type of management). Indeed, the best practices paper has a few pages on outsourcing on just this sort of work.

The full text on broker relationships from CalAlts =

Prime Broker and Hedge Fund Relationships

Over the past several years, bank regulations under Basel III have been implemented with the goal of ensuring banks are better situated to absorb financial and economic stress, have improved risk management and governance and have improved transparency. The focus of these regulations has been to increase the amount and quality of capital required, decrease leverage and improve the liquidity profiles of the banks. These regulations have required the banks to take a sharp look at their balance sheet usage resulting in a focus on their prime brokerage units. Consequently prime brokers have been caused to evaluate their portfolio of clients in the context of various metrics, including but not limited to, return on assets and risk weighted assets. This has caused prime brokers to be less inclined to grow balances and take on new business but rather to run their businesses strategically to meet clearly defined long-term targets. This pressure on the prime broker units has directly impacted the hedge funds that utilize their balance sheets.

Each prime broker has their own unique client portfolio mix and risk and return profile and thus their own metrics of what makes an optimal hedge fund client. They also have their own unique suite of service offerings and operational capabilities. Likewise, each hedge fund manager has their own unique strategy, operational infrastructure, client portfolio mix and unique opportunities and challenges in managing their business.

The relationship of the hedge fund business and the prime broker is of mutual benefit. The hedge fund manager looks to the prime broker for certain services specific to their profile such as financing, securities lending, access to balance sheet, capital introduction, research, etc. The prime brokers now look to the hedge fund client not to use all of their services to the max, but rather to manage their use of balance sheet, financing and service offerings in the most efficient and profitable manner. Both parties spend a great deal of time working to understand how to optimize the relationship using the levers at their disposal to increase profitability while minimizing additional risk to their portfolios and their organizations.

Not to be lost in this analysis, both parties need to continue to keep counterparty risk in mind. It remains critical that hedge funds understand where their assets are held and continue to diligently monitor the financial health and stability of their counterparties.

In order to maintain a successful relationship, the hedge fund and the prime broker need to have transparent communication on what the primary drivers are for each side. These conversations need to be frequent and need to look at the holistic client relationship tracking all resource consumption and revenue generation.

As the prime broker and hedge fund businesses as well as the market and regulatory environments evolve, this will be an area of continual change. Continued management of these relationships and transparent communication will continue to be imperative.

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.