No one Knows How Big Managed Futures Is

Trying to decipher the assets under management for the Managed Futures industry is enough to give anyone a headache. At first glance, it appears the Barclayhedge CTA Index recorded $13.3 Billion in inflows in 2016, enough to push the asset class to new all-time highs of $340 Billion in terms of assets under management, eclipsing the levels seen in the first quarter of 2013.

Our initial reaction to that news is that it’s good to see investors and institutions see the value of this asset class despite Managed Futures having a negative 2016.  But there’s also some debate on this number. Evestment, for example, has the industry gaining just $10.3 Billion (the only hedge fund strategy seeing inflows according to them).  And we’ve long taken issue with the numbers reported as assets under management in the space by Barclayhedge, who include the world’s largest hedge fund, Bridgewater, in the managed futures asset total.  In our opinion, this does a disservice to investors, vendors, and business people in the industry trying to gauge the size of the space and where they fit into it.  Add to that the fact that Winton is a $30 Billion+ manager who tends to dominate the asset raising in the space, and it’s not too big of a stretch to say the majority of assets as reported by BarclayHedge are from just two firms (Bridgewater and Winton).

Here’s a view of how much that record $340 Billion is really comprised of Bridgewater, Winton, and other giants.


As we’ve talked about in detail, the top 5% of firms with the highest AUM control 66% all the money in the managed futures space.

Asset Flows

But last year showed some promise for the rest of the Managed Futures space (“the field”) in terms of new assets, with about three quarters of the $13 Billion raised going to firms other than the Big 3 (1 of which shouldn’t even be in the conversation), leaving an impressive $9 Billion of asset growth on $161 Billion (about 5%).  Here’s the breakdown of reported asset growth, both including and excluding Bridgewater, Winton, and AQR.  As an aside, it’s hard not to be impressed with what AQR is doing with their AQMIX Liquid Alts fund, which has allowed them to outpace the heavyweights despite a crummy -8% 2016 return.

Managed Futures 2016 inflows

Of course, expanding our view beyond just 2016, we can see that the “field” outpacing the favorites in terms of asset raising has not been the norm. In fact, the amount of assets raised by Bridgewater, Winton, and AQR since the beginning of 2009 ($115 Billion) has been about six times the rest of the industry ($20 Billion). Again, don’t blame us for Bridgewater skewing the stats. Here’s what the growth in assets has looked like since 2009, where you can see the field having trouble getting back to new highs even while the total industry has hit them.


And finally, some interesting stats that jumped out to us:

  • For the first time in 2014, “the field” flows are consistently out of the red
  • “The field” is +$23 Billion since 2008
  • There were two monstrous inflows into “the field” of $14 Billion in Q4 ’15 and 11 Billion in Q1 ’16.
  • Assets of “the field” grew by 8% in 2016
  • There’s a $109 Billion difference between the asset flows of the Total Industry and “the field.”


In the end, there’s enough good news here to go around for everyone. Yes, most people we talk to agree that risk parity hedge fund Bridgewater should not be part of Managed Futures assets – so we’re looking at managed futures assets of more like $209 Billion, roughly half of which is comprised of Winton, AHL, AQR, H2O, and Two Sigma (which may be misclassified as well). But we still saw growth in assets for “the field” of managers not included in those names. If the big get bigger and  the small get less small – that’s an encouraging sign. You can’t get to a billion without first passing through a few hundred million.  That the industry is really only 2/3 the size its reported to be, is also good news for those who feel the industry has gotten too big and there are too many strategies chasing too few trends. Of course, the too few trends part may become problematic. We wouldn’t bet on investors repeating their 2016 moves and buying into managed futures losses this year. If we continue to see managed futures as a whole struggle, 2017’s numbers are likely going to be down.


Stay tuned…

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.