Volatility…Is That You?

And just like that… the calm seas turned a little choppy. With today’s ~+40% jump in the VIX, volatility is back on everyone’s mind. It only took the threat of nuclear war to get investors finally willing to think stocks won’t always advance upwards percent by percent week after week.

But this has to have been the most likely to occur “surprise” of all time…right?  You had Jeff Gunlach saying he’s buying Puts just yesterday… you had Warren Buffet sitting in $100 Billion in cash because he can’t find anything priced right.  But wait…. The Dow was down less than -1% on the day. This wasn’t Black Monday by any stretch of the imagination. This wasn’t even a beige Tuesday… It was an off-white Thursday compared with historic market sell offs. It was a perfectly normal stock market move around all time highs. Yet, the VIX rocketed 40% higher. What gives?

Well, we’ve been down this road before back in May when the $VIX Spiked 45% and returned to hum-drum lows. And to meet the increased demand in VIX strategies in the alternative investment space – investors have the go to VIX investment guide, a webinar with professional volatility trading hedge fund managers talking about how they look to capture alpha in the VIX, and even an infographic on the VIX for those who prefer pictures.

So where do we go from here?  The $VIX is up roughly 40% again – even if it was only a 4-point move – this time everyone is wondering if this slide time is different. If the market won’t rebound like it has the past dozen times and the VIX spike evaporates faster than an NFL player’s brain fluid – what’s going to happen? This is an on going discussion in the volatility space, and Zero Hedge was out with a post earlier this week sounding the doomsday alarms of what would happen with the roughly $4 Billion invested in VIX based ETPs when volatility does spike. They play out a scenario on what would happen if the S&P experienced a drop-off around 3.5% (about 2% more than today’s “sell-off”).

If VIX rises 12 points, 1-month VIX futures are likely up 5.5 points, a ~50% increase.  The 1-day percentage change is a big deal in the VIX complex because the levered and inverse VIX ETFs and ETNs rebalance daily based on the percentage change, and some of the thresholds for forced unwinds are based on the percentage change.  This is why lower vol creates higher risk.

ZeroHedge VIX Moves when low
2) In a 50% increase in VIX futures, the levered and inverse VIX ETFs and ETNs need to buy ~70,000 VIX futures to rebalance their portfolios and maintain target exposures (this estimate is net of redemptions – long vol ETPs are generally sold by their holders as vol rises, offsetting the levered rebalance).  While these flows likely occur near the close, the dynamic is well known, and many traders will bring forward those flows to the middle of the day.
Estimate VIX Futures to Buy for a 1 Point increase in VIX Futures
VIX Futures as S&P 500 Declines

We happened to have reached out to several volatility traders earlier this week after reading the Zero Hedge piece to get their input (as always, when we plan on writing about a market doing one thing, the day of posting the market does the other…) and thought no better a time to share that insight then after today’s spike:

We’ll lead off with Tim Jacobson of Pearl Capital Advisors (up about 9% on Thursday before fees – past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results), who has a handy chart breaking down previous VIX moves based on what price the VIX was at – at the time.

Below is a table that shows what the largest moves in the VIX Index have been since its inception in 1990. The table only includes the 72 instances when the VIX Index spiked by at least 20%. The table then breaks down the largest spikes within four buckets: VIX < 12, between 12 and 15, between 15 and 20, and when VIX is greater than 20. Based on these data, we could support the argument that an unwind of the short-vol trade could cause the VIX Index to spike more than 7 points from its current level. Readers must keep in mind that generally, the VIX futures have about a 50% reaction to moves in the VIX Index. This number is historically lower as VIX is lower. However, if an unwind were to be sudden enough, we could see the VIX futures reacting more than usual/expected. For managers who have a model or process to identify and capture these kinds of moves, a reversal in volatility could present some lucrative opportunities.

Largest VIX moves

The most moves above 20% came when the $VIX was already above the 20 price. This isn’t all that surprising when you consider that historically, the $VIX hasn’t spent very long below 12 or below 15 (except in its current period).  The biggest $VIX Spike was 64% when it was under 12, but what if we see a 100% move? That sounds crazy, but in today’s environment, that would put the $VIX at 20 – a very standard number. Brett Nelson of Certeza Capital says it wouldn’t “break” the market – but it could set the scene for some major movement for the VIX and $ES_F.

Indeed, a VIX move from 10.00 to 20.00 is a 100% increase, but would not have a devastating impact on the vol markets. However, the current condition of the VIX term structure allows for the possibility of an unprecedented event. For example, if SPX were to decline steadily to near 2400, VIX would rise, but likely not above 20. That initial move would be unlikely to rattle the vol sellers, and in fact many would consider increasing exposure because their models would be telling them vol is expensive. It’s not difficult to imagine many algos buying there and pushing VIX back down toward the mid teens; a move that would be reinforced by discretionary vol sellers as they balance their portfolios to accommodate a perceived increase in profit potential. At that time, the stage would be set for a surprise SPX move below 2400. With reasonable momentum it could very well result in a 4-5% drop in a single day. VIX would exceed 50 and severe backwardation in the futures term structure and heavy skew in the options would necessitate a massive short vol offset. The impact on the vol sellers would be felt far and wide because most hedges based on traditional correlation assumptions would fail to deliver on their promise.

Darren Kottle of Caddo Capitalechoess Brett- saying this could be shaping up for a worrisome scenario.

In recent years, equities have rebounded rapidly after every selloff we’ve experienced.  Anybody who has timed the hedge right will by necessity want to unwind quickly otherwise they’ll lose gains.  Coupled with VIX sellers who have been rewarded for selling on spikes, you see a VIX rise that reverses quickly.  A multi-leg equity selloff that is more severe than what we’ve seen recently will show VIX’s true color:  that of an extreme autocorrelated asset that can easily go parabolic.

All this being said, Nelson says it’s important to distinguish between probability and expectancy.

A huge majority of volatility traders tend to confuse probability with expectancy, and it is really the latter that matters. Because of this, they are unwittingly entering a negative expectancy trade simply because it offers high probability. High probability generally equates to consistency over some indefinite time period and skewed risk metrics give the investor a false impression of the managers’ long-term risk profiles. Unfortunately, the combination of high probability and negative expectancy in the same trade is the definition of high tail risk. They are settling for significantly reduced profit at dramatically increased risk, hoping that the eventual spike doesn’t happen at a time when their hands are tied.  On the other hand, I’m typically equally dismayed by habitual vol buyers who love to blindly buy vol at low VIX levels; doing so simply on the basis that a market drop must come at some point. As we’ve experienced many times, grinding low-vol bull markets can last for quite some time. The traditional slope of the VIX term structure offers little in terms of positive expectancy for the persistent vol buyer. Albeit, this is one case where they are correct in spite of their lack of edge. The term structure has thrown the odds wildly in their favor for the last 4 months.

While half the investment world may be shuddering after today’s volatility spike, worrying that there long time gains in equities may be under some stress (not to mention the short volatility traders who are likely seeing some scarring after today –  there’s a substantial amount of investment managers who have been waiting on volatility like this for a long time, and can finally, maybe, put away their voodoo dolls and stop their volatility rain dances for a spell to see what their models can do in an increased volatility environment. Who are they, besides the pros mentioned above – schedule a time to talk to an alternative investment specialist today to learn who’s itching to put money to work in an increased volatility environment.

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.