January 2, 2020
rcm-alternatives
Like
Welcome to early 2020, where we have a whole year of TBDs and fill-in-the-blanks ahead of us. One of the big unknowns for us in the US is whether the negative interest rate experiment will spread from Asia and Europe onto our shores. We covered what this could mean for alternative investments in our Global Macro/Managed Futures Outlook….
…there’s nearly $16 Trillion in negative yielding debt sloshing around the world. That sounds crazy, and irrational, and clearly unsustainable. And indeed, more than a fair share of managed futures/global macro managers complain about the artificiality of negative interest rates and how it has messed with the trendiness of bond markets – feeling that it is an unnatural event caused by central banks over reach (as evidenced by the Bank of Japan owning about half and ECB about 30% of their respective governments bonds).
But Pimco had an interesting take this year, saying negative interest rates are a natural result of a savings glut and increasing negative time preference of the world’s savers.
It can be argued that in affluent societies where people can expect to live ever longer and thus spend a significant amount of their lifetimes in retirement, more and more people demonstrate negative time preference, meaning they value future consumption during their retirement more than today’s consumption. To transfer purchasing power to the future via saving today, they are thus willing to accept a negative interest rate and bring it about through their saving behavior.
There seems to be a consensus that rates won’t go negative in the US, but surely this negative time preference concept is alive and well here in the US as much as in Europe, so we’re not so sure. And it’s never a good idea to think in absolutes. But here’s the best part…..we don’t care.
The futures investor can capture the same return on, say, a 20% move in interest rates, that they did with rates going from 3.50% to 2.80% as they can from rates going from 1.50% to 1.20%. They’ll just trade more contracts… while keeping their risk normalized between the two scenarios with tighter exits the lower the rates get.
Futures traders can also earn the roll yield when and if interest rate products go into backwardation, whereby even if rates remain unchanged, if they are expected to rise and don’t – the futures price will converge to the cash price at the end of the contract and provide the difference (the roll yield). As proof of all of this, look at the returns of the SocGen Trend Indicator in 2019 across the interest rate products:
You can clearly see the trend indicator having positive performance in the German Bobl, Bund, and Japan’s Government Bonds (JGB), despite all of those yielding negative rates for much, if not all of the year, and despite all of them moving within a pretty tight range in terms of the absolute level of movement (the JGB, for example, moved from about 0% to -0.29% at its lows).
Keep reading in our Managed Futures/Global Macro 2020 Outlook! And Happy new Year!
Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.
The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.
Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.
Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.
Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.
Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.
RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.
Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings
The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.
