Just how crazy was September for VIX Traders?

Oil going negative. The Swiss Franc de-pegging from the US Dollar. The Dow losing 1000 points in 36 minutes in the flash crash. These were all outlier events there in plain sight, reported ad nauseum in the financial press. But the largest front month VIX index loss during a down month in the S&P 500 in the past 10 years, that’s not quite front page news for the Wall Street Journal. And, to be honest, it was a bit of a non-event except in the small circle of traders and investors who utilize the negative correlation between the VIX and stock market to structure dynamic market hedges. But in that small circle, September was as crazy of a month as most of them can remember.

For those of you who golf, you’ll know that the worst rounds come when you have a “two may miss” going. When you sometimes pull it, sometimes fade it – the ball is going everywhere and you have a problem knowing where to aim. September saw some of that action in the VIX, with volatility first rising along with the stock market, then rising along with a sell off, then falling with a sell off, before settling in to a more normal pattern towards the end of the month. Where, exactly, were VIX traders supposed to aim with this two way miss going on?


From a longer term perspective, there have only been two other months in the past 30 years which saw a larger decline in the stock market while the VIX also printed a negative value (Nov ’08 and Sep ’90), although there have been 14 larger volatility moves down when the stock market was also down more than -1%. Indeed, this happens around 14% of the time the market is down more than 1%, making it unwelcome, and even uncommon, but not unexpected.


Finally, it wasn’t just a weird month for the VIX in relation to the stock market, but also within the VIX complex itself. As a reminder, you can’t trade the VIX itself, it being just an index. To gain access, you must trade VIX futures which expire every month. That creates a VIX futures curve which usually looks like the one on the left below (from Sep. 2018), in what we call ‘contango’ (being more expensive further out in the future). Except, the curve currently (the one on the right)  has this odd bump in it for the November contract, reflecting the potential election volatility in the US, and after that has nearly the exact opposite look as usual (backwardation, or cheaper prices out into the future). This is back to the two way miss phenomenon, as there is both contango and backwardation in the same curve, making It hard to bet on portions of the curve becoming more or less their respective stance.

Perhaps because of this unique curve in the VIX futures and being within 2 months of the US election, we saw some odd action in the different contract months of the VIX futures in September, such as the front month futures index down -9.5% while the 3 month futures index was up +3.2%. But it wasn’t just where these indices ended up, it’s where they were intramonth as well. You can see the ‘double miss’ type pattern below where the first part of the month saw front month futures outperform back month, while the second part of the month saw that pattern completely unwind and back month hold up while front month basically crashed.

Add it all up and it was that weird for VIX traders in September. But it’s too easy to say it was some 1-in-100 year storm or some totally unexpected movement. The truth is the two way miss was more of the problem for VIX traders, with the month seeing on again, off again correlations through several mini cycles. As we said before, it was more unwelcome than unexpected.


The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.