Return Stacking: From Theory to Practice – A 2024 Perspective

Remember back in 2021 when Rodrigo Gordillo (@RodGordilloP), Adam Butler (@GestaltU), and Corey Hoffstein (@choffstein) introduced us to “Return Stacking“? What started as an intriguing whitepaper has blossomed into something much bigger, transforming how many of us think about portfolio construction. Let’s dive into how this concept has evolved and why it matters even more today.

The Basics Haven’t Changed (But The World Has)

At its heart, return stacking remains beautifully simple – it’s about using leverage intelligently to enhance returns across non-correlated assets. Think of it like building a layer cake instead of dividing up a pie. Rather than choosing between different investments, you’re combining them in ways that can actually reduce portfolio risk while improving returns. Pretty neat, right?

From Paper to Practice

What’s really exciting is how this concept has moved from theoretical discussions to real-world applications. Corey Hoffstein and the team at Resolve haven’t just talked the talk – they’ve walked the walk by launching a comprehensive suite of Return Stacked ETFs. These aren’t just any ETFs; they’re carefully designed tools that make sophisticated investment strategies accessible to everyday investors.

The lineup includes combinations like U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures (RSST), Bonds & Managed Futures (RSBT), US Stocks & Futures Yield (RSSY), Bonds & Futures Yield (RSBY), and Global Stocks & Bonds (RSSB). Each one represents a different way to stack returns and manage risk in today’s complex market environment.

Why It Matters More Than Ever

The investment landscape has changed dramatically since 2021. We’ve seen inflation surge, interest rates climb, and traditional investment relationships get turned on their head. Remember when bonds were supposed to zig when stocks zagged? Those correlations haven’t been as reliable lately, which can make return stacking even more relevant.

Here’s what’s particularly interesting about today’s environment: While the original paper discussed return stacking as a solution for low yields, it’s proving equally valuable in our current higher-rate environment, just for different reasons. The higher rates have actually made the T-Bill component of return stacking strategies more meaningful, adding an extra layer of return potential that wasn’t available in 2021.

Real-World Impact

The proof is in the pudding, as they say. Earlier this year, we had Rodrigo and Adam back on our podcast for what turned out to be our most popular episode of the year. They dove deep into how return stacking fits with other strategies, particularly the carry trade. What was fascinating was hearing how these concepts have performed in actual portfolios during some pretty turbulent market conditions.

They shared some really interesting insights about how different types of carry work across various asset classes – from bonds to commodities, currencies to equities. But what really caught our attention was their discussion of how carry strategies can work alongside trend following approaches, creating something potentially more robust than either strategy alone.

Check out the full episode:

Looking Forward

As we wrap up 2024 and look ahead to 2025, return stacking feels more relevant than ever. The investment community has embraced and built upon these ideas, with the return stacking principles and products applied in all sorts of creative ways – from sophisticated institutional portfolios to do it yourself retail investors yearning for a more efficient approach. . 

Markets aren’t getting any simpler, and the need for sophisticated yet implementable investment strategies continues to grow. The beauty of how return stacking has evolved is that it’s now accessible to almost any investor through the suite of ETFs. 

The conversations around return stacking have evolved too. They’re less about whether it works and more about how to implement it most effectively. Questions like how to optimize the stack, which combinations work best in different environments, and how to integrate it with existing portfolios are now at the forefront.

It’s even become part of the popular lexicon, as heard in this holiday TV ad:

https://youtu.be/yJQcysK89u0?t=22

For those who’ve been watching this space evolve since 2021, it’s been fascinating to see theory turn into practice. And for those just discovering return stacking now, you’re joining the conversation at an exciting time. The tools are more accessible than ever, and the strategy has been battle-tested through some pretty challenging market conditions.

The investment world rarely gives us true innovations – most “new” ideas are just old ones repackaged. But return stacking feels different. It’s taken a sophisticated concept and made it practical and accessible, which might be the most innovative part of all.

Check out the Return Stacking whitepaper for more on this topic: https://info.rcmalternatives.com/return-stacking

 

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

logo