Patience in Alts: Man Group Shows trend in Trend’s Initial Struggles

We’ve been discussing the challenges facing trend following strategies during April’s market volatility here in our post Paging Mr. Trend Following and in Jeff Malec’s, recent tweet thread. Many investors are understandably frustrated by the performance of trend and other alternatives during this market downturn.

Right on cue, managed futures pioneer Man Group has published a timely piece addressing this very issue. Their analysis offers additional historical context that might help investors maintain perspective during these challenging conditions.

Be Patient?

We’re all familiar with the conventional wisdom about patience in stock markets: “wait out bear markets,” “stocks go up long-term,” “be a patient investor.” But Man Group’s research flips the script with an intriguing take—be patient not just with your stocks, but with your alternatives, particularly trend following strategies.

What makes Man Group’s analysis particularly compelling is their examination of data surrounding three major market crises. They have the receipts, so to speak:

The Dot-Com Bubble (2000-2002)

  • Trend strategies initially lost approximately 10% as markets whipsawed
  • After recalibration, patient investors were rewarded with returns exceeding 40%
  • Even on the path to these impressive gains, trend followers endured another 20% drawdown

 

Performance of the Société Générale Trend Index and S&P 500 in the three months prior and during the GFC crisis

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results.

The Global Financial Crisis (2007-2009)

  • Trend strategies suffered a drawdown of nearly 17% during the initial market shock
  • However, they had already adapted defensive positions before the S&P entered a prolonged bear market
  • These adjusted positions delivered significant crisis alpha as the downturn accelerated

 

Performance of the Société Générale Trend Index and S&P 500 in the three months prior and during the GFC crisis

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results.

The Inflation Episode (2022)

  • S&P 500 experienced a sharp 4% drawdown in November 2021
  • This triggered a 6% reversal for trend-following strategies
  • After positions adapted, trend following delivered strong performance as inflation trends became established

 

Performance of the Société Générale Trend Index and S&P 500 in the three months prior and during the inflation episode of 2022

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results.

The Three-Phase Pattern

The Man piece identifies a bit of a trend across these varied crisis periods:

1.Initial Shock and Position Misalignment – Legacy positions lead to losses as rapid price movements contradict established trends

2.Adaptive Recalibration – Trend models adjust positioning, de-risking where appropriate and identifying emerging trends

3.Delivering Crisis Alpha – Strategies eventually align with sustained market moves, delivering the protection investors seek

Will history repeat this time?  Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. And the big question is:  is this a correction (that’s already over..) or is this the start of a so called ‘crisis period’ for equities. Whatever your answer to that question, April has undoubtdely seen an ‘initial shock’ and ‘position misalignment’. And being here on the front lines seeing different trend followers positioning, we can confirm Man’s thoughts tha trend strategies are already adjusting positions—currently taking a more defensive stance by shorting equities, going long bonds, and shorting energies.

So is crisis next?  We could easily argue that the fleeting nature of the tweets and reversals and all the rest represent perhaps just a correction. But as Man says:  History suggests that policy shifts tend to have lasting unintended and unexpected consequences that ripple through markets as participants take time to digest their impact

Whatever way it breaks for trend followers, patience will definitely be key. Whether they catch this downturn or not, does not mean they will not capture the next one, or the one after that. Trend’s diversifying, Non-Correlation, is not negative correlation. It can and will decline during sharp stock market declines. Worried about longer term declines… be patient. 

As Man Group aptly puts it: “Trend can indeed be a friend in times of market stress—but it’s a friend that tends to show up just before the real party begins.”

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

logo