A Short History of Market-Moving Middle East Conflicts

Every generation of investors learns the same lesson the hard way: Middle East conflicts spike oil and spook stocks, and then markets do whatever they want. Monday’s price action was a textbook example. US and Israeli strikes on Iran sent oil up 13%, stocks down, and bonds up in the overnight session. By the close? The S&P 500 finished with a gain of less than 0.1%, oil had given back more than half its surge, and Treasuries reversed.[13][18] It’s a pattern that has repeated, with only one true exception, for over fifty years.

Here’s the scorecard.*

#
Conflict
Date
Oil Move
S&P Move
Resolution Speed
1
Yom Kippur War & Arab Oil Embargo
Oct 1973–Mar 1974
Oil nearly quadrupled, from ~2.90to2.90 to 2.90to11.65/bbl [7]
S&P 500 fell 40% over the following year [13]
Sustained bear market — the only true outlier
2
Iranian Revolution
1978–1979
Oil roughly doubled to ~$39.50/bbl [24]
Down 6.2% over one month; recovered 5.3% over 12 months [45]
S&P didn't truly bottom until mid-1982 (–25%), compounded by monetary tightening [45]
3
Iran–Iraq War Outbreak
Sept 1980
Oil rose to ~40/bblfrom 40/bbl from ~40/bblfrom 35 [40]
Down 15% initially; S&P finished 1980 up ~26% [24]
Weeks — trade routes adjusted
4
Gulf War (Iraq invades Kuwait)
Aug 1990–Feb 1991
Oil doubled, from 17to17 to 17to36/bbl [7]
S&P fell 18%; took 260 days to recover [54]
On Jan 17 1991 (Desert Storm launch): oil crashed 33%, S&P jumped 3.7% [19]. S&P up 29% by year-end [40]
5
Iraq War
Mar 2003
Oil fell from pre-war highs near 37toavg37 to avg 37toavg30/bbl in 2003 [1]
 S&P up 13.8% in 3 months, 18.6% in 6 months [13]
Immediate — classic "sell the rumor, buy the news"
6
Israel–Hezbollah War
Jul–Aug 2006
Oil hit record $79/bbl [1]
Brief 5% S&P correction [24]
Weeks
7
Arab Spring & Libya
Feb–Oct 2011
Oil rose from 92 to 92 to 92 to120/bbl [19]
S&P fell 21.6% peak-to-trough (mostly Euro debt crisis/US downgrade) [1]
Months — but driven by non-ME factors
8
ISIS Surge in Iraq
Jun–Dec 2014
Brent spiked to 115 on Jun 19[2],then∗∗collapsed 4115 on Jun 19, then **collapsed 44%** by Dec on supply glut [9][15]
S&P max drawdown –7%; finished 2014 up +11% [50]
Supply/demand overwhelmed geopolitics
9
Saudi Aramco Drone Attack
Sept 14, 2019
Oil jumped ~14%, from 60to60 to 60to69/bbl [34]
S&P finished the day roughly flat [1]
Two weeks — Aramco fully restored production [1]
10
Soleimani Assassination
Jan 3, 2020
WTI up 3.1% to $63.05 [34]
S&P down 0.7% [1]
Days — both sides de-escalated
11
Israel–Hamas War
Oct 7, 2023
 WTI up 3.59to3.59 to 3.59to86.38; Brent up 3.57to3.57 to 3.57to88.15 [38]
S&P gained 0.63% on first trading day [5]
Immediate for markets
12
Iran–Israel Direct Strikes
Apr 13–19, 2024
Brent briefly touched ~$90; quickly faded
S&P futures up 0.3% [49]
Immediate — attack telegraphed, 99% intercepted
13
Israel–Iran War (Jun 2025)
Jun 13–24, 2025
Brent jumped 7.6% [54]
S&P day-one loss ~1% [54]
Oil retreated to near pre-conflict levels after Jun 24 ceasefire
14
US–Israel Strikes on Iran ("Operation Epic Fury")
Feb 28, 2026 – ongoing
Oil up 13% intraday; Brent settled +6.7% at 77.74;WTI+6.377.74; WTI +6.3% at 77.74;WTI+6.371.23 [18][19]
S&P finished with a gain of less than 0.1%; Dow dipped 0.1% [13]. Nikkei –1.35%, STOXX 600 –1.76% [18]
Strait of Hormuz effectively closed; situation fluid

 

What the Data Actually Says

Across all 14 conflicts, the averages tell a consistent story. Total S&P 500 drawdowns around Middle East geopolitical events have averaged 4.6% (median 2.9%) over an average of about 19 days (median 8 days).[54] Geopolitical-driven S&P 500 selloffs are typically modest at around 3%, and equities typically recover rapidly once the conflict has stabilized.[49] Since 1967, except for the Yom Kippur War in 1973, none of the 11 major military conflicts involving Israel have had a lasting impact on oil prices.[51]

The only true exception, the 1973 embargo,  involved a sustained physical withholding of oil supply for months, not a military strike. The Gulf War (1990) produced the second-worst equity drawdown at 18%, with the S&P 500 taking 260 days to recover,[54] but even that was reversed by year-end, with the S&P up 29% from the start of Operation Desert Shield.[40] In both cases, it was the broader economic environment, recession dynamics and monetary policy, that determined whether the oil shock became a lasting equity decline, not the headline violence itself.[54]

The Pattern Since the 1970s: Buy the Rumor, Sell the News

From the 2003 Iraq War onward, every single Middle East conflict has followed the same playbook for equity investors: futures plunge overnight on the headlines, oil spikes, safe havens catch a bid, and then the session reverses as traders assess the disruption as temporary or contained. The Iraq War saw the S&P gain 13.8% in three months after bombing began.[13] The Aramco drone attack moved oil 14% but the S&P finished flat.[34][1] Monday’s action, oil up 13% at the highs, S&P futures sharply lower overnight, and then a full reversal to a fractional S&P gain by the close[13][18], fit the template almost perfectly.

That said, the Strait of Hormuz is effectively closed to tanker traffic as of this writing, and the situation remains fluid.[18] If history rhymes, the market is betting this resolves like every post-1973 conflict: quickly. If it doesn’t, if physical oil supply is durably impaired, then the 1973 playbook, not the 2019 one, becomes the relevant comparison. The market has chosen its side. It almost always does. It’s also been right almost every time, except when it wasn’t.

 

*This data was sourced with the help of AI, please check for accuracy. 

Sources:

  1. The US Response to Attacks on Persian Gulf Oil Infrastructure and Strategic Implications for Petro-States | Baker Institute
  2. This Week In Petroleum Summary Printer-Friendly Version
  3. 2014–2016 world oil market chronology – Wikipedia
  4. S&P 500 Index (SP500) Stock Historical Price Data, Closing Price | Seeking Alpha
  5. Dow closes nearly 200 points higher, as investors shake off rising oil prices from Israel-Hamas war: Live updates
  6. S&P 500: Is Iran The Trigger For A Break? (Technical Analysis) | Seeking Alpha
  7. Abqaiq–Khurais attack – Wikipedia
  8. Iraq violence slingshots Brent, WTI to highest levels of 2014
  9. Why did the price of oil fall after June 2014? | CEPR
  10. S&P 500 (Monthly) – United States – Historical Data & Trends
  11. Israel’s wars mean ‘massive’ returns for US arms company investors | Responsible Statecraft
  12. How US-Iran tensions could shape world markets By Reuters
  13. Attack On Saudi Oil Facilities Makes Oil Prices Spike : NPR
  14. Iraq ISIS Crisis Driving Gas Pump Prices Higher But Global Economic Danger Low, For Now
  15. Crude oil prices down sharply in fourth quarter of 2014 – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
  16. Measuring Worth – Growth rates of US Stock Indexes
  17. US equity markets react to Israel-Hamas conflict | IG International
  18. Stocks plunge in global selloff, but some on Wall Street are looking for assets that respond well to war | Fortune
  19. What the Attacks on Saudi Aramco’s Main Oil Plant Mean for Its Massive IPO | Fortune
  20. 1 G L O B A L E C O N O M Y The 2014 plunge in import petroleum
  21. S&P 500 Historical Prices by Year – Multpl
  22. The impact of the Hamas-Israel conflict on the U.S. defense industry stock market return | PLOS One
  23. Wall Street Turns to ‘Haven-First’ Strategy Amid Iran Crisis
  24. What We Know About The Attack On Saudi Oil Facilities
  25. Year in Review: Crude Oil Prices 2014
  26. S&P 500 (SP500) | FRED | St. Louis Fed
  27. Israel-Related Stocks Under Pressure After Hamas’ Shock Attack
  28. The Fallout Of U.S.-Iran Round Two (SP500) | Seeking Alpha
  29. Saudi Aramco Attacks: Crude Oil Shock and Your Stocks – Market Realist
  30. Explanations for the 2014 oil price decline: Supply or demand? – ScienceDirect
  31. S&P 500 Historical Data (SPX) – Investing.com
  32. Dow climbs nearly 200 points as investors brush off worries about rising oil prices | CNN Business
  33. Here’s what Wall Street expects from financial markets after Iran’s attack on Israel | Fortune
  34. Attacks on Saudi Oil Facilities: Effects and Responses – EveryCRSReport.com
  35. The 2014 plunge in import petroleum prices: What happened? : Beyond the Numbers : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  36. Oil Price Charts | Oilprice.com
  37. S&P 500 (^GSPC) Historical Data – Yahoo Finance
  38. Stock market today: Oil prices and defense stocks climb after Israel declares war on Hamas
  39. US-Israel Strikes On Iran Send Nasdaq, S&P 500 Futures Lower As Offensive Continues Across The Middle East — LMT, RTX, XOM, USO, BATL On Traders’ Radar Today
  40. Saudi Arabia crude oil production outage affects global crude oil and gasoline prices – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
  41. U.S. Crude Oil First Purchase Price (Dollars per Barrel)
  42. Chart of the Day: Saudi Aramco vs. S&P 500 Integrated Oil & Gas | Lipper Alpha Insight | LSEG
  43. Premarket stocks: What the Israel-Hamas war means for US markets | CNN Business
  44. S&P 500 Futures Plunge: Stark 1% Drop Follows US-Israel Strikes on Iran
  45. Attacks on Saudi Oil Facilities: Effects and Responses | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
  46. ISIS creates an oil shock, but why?
  47. Rethinking the oil market in the aftermath of the 2014–16 price slump | CEPR
  48. S&P 500 Historical Annual Returns (1927-2026)
  49. Iran Attacks Israel. How Could Markets Be Impacted?
  50. Biggest IPO in history: Saudi Aramco shares priced | Business and Economy | Al Jazeera
  51. JPM Analysts Look at Israel Military Conflicts and Oil Prices | Rigzone
  52. What triggered the oil price plunge of 2014-2016 and why it failed to deliver an economic impetus in eight charts
  53. S&P 500 – 10 Year Daily Chart
  54. Israel-Iran Conflict: Stocks Face Another Geopolitical Test
  55. Analyzing financial market reactions to the Palestine-Israel conflict: An event study perspective – ScienceDirect

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

logo