October 15, 2010
Attain Capital
Like
Interconti’s Tim Merryman (aka Yoda) passed along the following BNY/Pershing study on individually managed accounts (they call them separately managed accounts [SMAs]) yesterday….
The study (excerpt below) finds that SMAs are gaining traction in the hedge fund industry, with hedge funds hesitant to provide them but investors demanding them because of the transparency and liquidity they offer.
Investors and hedge fund managers both viewed SMAs as an effective tool for meeting increased demands for transparency, liquidity and influence on the investment philosophy. However, gaps exist between investor demand and the willingness of hedge fund managers to offer SMAs.
Read the full piece here: Transparency and Liquidity_Managed Account
For us in the managed futures industry who have been dealing with individually managed accounts for decades; the collective comment is likely something along the lines of “it’s about time” or “welcome to the club”.
Our question is whether hedge funds can meet investor demand for individually managed accounts even if they wanted to. With the leverage they employ, off exchange transactions, and frequent need for a large pool of money (i.e. you likely can’t ask Goldman Sachs to create a short trade on mortgage backed securities for just $1,000,000; or buy a significant stake in a growing company for less than $100s of millions), the likely scenario is that separately managed accounts will only be available to the largest of hedge fund investors ($50MM to $250 MM minimums). And who would the counterparty be for some large bet, the investor or the fund?
All of this tells me that the affluent mom & pop investor (an oxymoron?) with up to $5mm will be unable to access SMAs for hedge funds, and this is mainly a discussion reserved for the largest of pension funds and family offices.
The managed futures space, meanwhile, was practically built for this type of thing, with large and capable futures clearing merchants providing real time transparency into positions, the trading of exchange traded futures allowing for daily liquidity, and the leverage built into futures contracts allowing for smaller minimum investment levels (where an individually managed account can actually make sense for…. an individual).
For more on Tim Merryman and Interconti, visit https://www.intercontilimited.com/
Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.
The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.
Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.
Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.
Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.
Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.
RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.
Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings
The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.
December 10, 2010
[…] become the new norm as we had hoped (although they have increased in popularity – see here). The SEC has made a splash with some high profile insider trading cases, but there haven’t […]