PFGBest on Liquidation Only, Receivership Likely

EDIT: New information from the NFA, see our latest post.

At this point, many of you may have heard that FCM PFGBest has been put on liquidation only by the NFA. The following email was sent to brokers and clients of the FCM:


We don’t like reporting information that has not been confirmed, but the stories have already begun to circulate, so we will tell you what we do know. Russ Wassendorf, Sr., CEO at PFGBest, attempted to commit suicide this morning, leaving behind a note indicating that accounting irregularities would be found. In turn, the NFA placed the firm on liquidation only. The extent and nature of said irregularities are yet to be determined, but our sources have indicated that it was not related to customer segregation issues and may be something to do with Wassendorf’s personal trading account. The story is still evolving, and we will likely not know the full scope of the problem today. However, some in the industry have indicated that the situation may be handled by receivership. This is good news, as it is a much smoother, faster process than resolving accounts in the midst of a bankruptcy.

We are closely monitoring and investigating the situation, and will update you as more information becomes available. However, we know the MF Global comparisons have already begun, so until those final details come to light, it’s important to realize the large differences between the two situations:

  1. The rumors are often worse than the real thing. At this point, it is all rumors outside of the PFG email above.
  1. There has been no talk of client money at risk or PFG going bankrupt. With MF Global, the firm’s financial health was a focus in the media for weeks prior to the bankruptcy. Client funds were a focus from the moment trading was halted. This hasn’t been the case here.
  1. The SIPC is not involved here, which is what delayed things for months upon months with MF Global. We would expect that, should things unravel, PFG’s entire business would be moved within a few days to a new clearing firm. That is infinitely smoother than what happened with MF Global.
  1. PFG was not large enough to be investing in European bonds or the like as MF Global was doing. They were a firm focused on futures and forex clearing only.
  1. No notice was received from Jeffries, the clearing broker for PFG, that they were failing to meet customer fund segregation obligations. Further, we confirmed weeks ago that they do NOT use the alternative method of net-capitalization calculation.

Stay tuned for further updates.

One comment

  1. PFG Best has been a highly dubious company for quite a while. I know about a case in which PFG Best has been confiscating a six digit USD figure – monies from an introducing broker for unwarranted legal claims by investors of said introducing broker. There is no surprise that Mr. Wasendorf Sr. is involved in dubious transactions. For the record of CFTC investigators: Mr. Wasendorf Sr and Mr. Wasendorf Jr. have been repeatedly in breach of a very simple CFTFC rule – failing to supervise their employees and staff. Nobody from PFG Best´s management was ever controlling the inner organization. I could spend weeks here and write about the mess this company is/was.

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.