PFGBest Update: 7 Takeaways from the CCC Bankruptcy Breakdown

Great piece out this morning by our friend John Roe at the Commodity Customer Coalition (CCC) regarding the PFGBest bankruptcy and some details of how things could unfold, though they are careful to say (and we want to reinforce) that it is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. You can read the full piece here, but the highlights are as follows:

1. PFGBest filed chapter 7 (pure liquidation) versus chapter 11 (reorganization with hopes of emerging), meaning the bankruptcy is handled by Chapter 7 law and relevant portions of the Commodity Exchange Act. Our read on this is that futures clients should take top priority in the disbursement of funds, with no exception.

2. PFGBest was a much simpler entity than MF Global, with PFGBest having a few wholly-owned subsidiaries owned by Wassendorf, whereas, in the MFGlobal case, we had to tackle a publicly traded holding company which owned many, many subsidiaries, financing arms, and so forth. Our read on this is that it should be simpler (and quicker) to indentify assets and unwind.

3. Because customer funds are missing, there wasn’t a bulk transfer of customer accounts to another FCM as happens in a “normal bankruptcy” when no customer funds are missing. As such, there can’t be a release of the verified customer funds ($125 million at this point) until the trustee can prepare final statements for customers and determine what assets are available for distribution and the payment of administrative costs – part of the reason they retained some PFGBest staff for 60 days. Our read here is that the customer should see at least 25% of their money within 60 days.  This was the first request Attain made of the CCC, to file a motion to release as much of the confirmed money as possible as soon as possible.

4. The trustee does have the right to pay administrative costs (the costs of unwinding the firm) out of customer funds if there are not enough corporate assets to cover those costs.  This was a point of confusion until now, so it’s good to be getting some clarity.

5. The CCC will advise the trustee to make the first distribution of money (what we believe to be 25% to 30%) as a bulk transfer versus a claims process. This bulk transfer of customer assets to the firm of customer choosing, instead of the more lengthy claims process, is something we’ve been rallying for.

6. Because PFGBest was a non-clearing FCM and used Jefferies to facilitate trades on foreign exchanges, the CCC feels it is unlikely that any money will be held up in foreign bankruptcy proceedings. Even better, they feel there is likely to be little distinction between normal customer segregated funds and so called 30.7 funds, which are the funds held to margin positions on foreign domiciled futures exchanges.  The fear was that foreign balances qualified as 30.7 funds are only “secured” funds (i.e. backed by firm assets) instead of “segregated” funds, which have top priority. Attain sent several inquiries and information to the CCC detailing how customers sending in money to PFGBEST in Euros, Yen, Aussie Dollars, and so on sent their money to a JP Morgan account labeled “customer segregated funds,” and were never told nor authorized the conversion of all of that money from such segregated status to secured status.

7. Because Wasendorf, Sr. made an outright confession that he committed fraud, the Trustee can use the clawback provision of the Bankruptcy code to retrieve money sent from Wasendorf to his son, recent bride, and so on.  They do not believe this would include customers who withdrew money from PFGBEST before the news hit.

We will continue to cover developments as they come out, but in the meantime, we urge you to consider signing our petition calling for Congress and the CFTC to launch a full investigation of the NFA. It only takes a few minutes, you do not have to publicly display your signature, and the significance of this effort cannot be understated. We’ve provided an in-depth explanation of how important a move this is, but please don’t hesitate to contact us directly with any questions. And of course, be sure to follow along with the blog for new information on the case as it hits.

One comment

  1. Great recap… What leads you (and John) to believe that the PFG ponzi, unlike other ponzis, won’t entail a clawback from customers who withdrew prior to the fraud being brought to light?

Write a Comment

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

Disclaimer
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.

logo