PFGBest Update: Chapter 7

In case you missed it, PFGBest filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Bloomberg reports:

Peregrine listed assets of more than $500 million and debt of more than $100 million in a Chapter 7 petition filed today in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Chicago. Separately, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer issued an order freezing Peregrine’s assets at the CFTC’s request, saying it appeared there was “good cause” to believe the firm and its founder, Russell Wasendorf Sr., violated the federal Commodity Exchange Act.

We also now know that a receiver has been appointed:

Pallmeyer’s order today prohibited the destruction of the firm’s books and records and granted the CFTC’s request for access to inspect them. She also appointed a receiver, Michael M. Eidelman of Chicago’s Vedder Price PC, placing him in charge of the business.

“Until further order of the court,” she said, “the receiver’s compensation is limited to $25,000 to be satisfied first out of available assets of defendant Russell R. Wasendorf Sr. and then from available assets of defendant Peregrine Financial Group Inc.”

Alright, so what does this all mean? There are a couple of things to note. First off, the declaration of Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is frequently referred to as liquidation bankruptcy, and the appointment of a receiver, are good news, as it’s a step toward locking up assets and moving the process along. There’s a wide range of potential liabitilities and assets, so we’re not sure what the final outcome will be. In a perfect world, it’s minimal liabilities and maximum assets, but we won’t know whether that’s the case until the proceedings are further along.

That being said, it appears as though the bankruptcy may proceed under commodity laws, and that is definitely good to hear. The freezing of assets and appointment of the receiver were done by the district court at the behest of the CFTC as a result of potential violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. We’re no lawyers, but from what we’ve gathered, the filing by the entity explicitly categorized as an FCM (unlike MFGH) keeps the bankruptcy proceedings under commodity laws, putting commodity clients first in line under 17 C.F.R §190. 

The coming days and weeks will bring more clarity on how the situation will be resolved. Our top priority remains the protection of our clients. Making them whole, obviously, is the first step, but we also don’t EVER want to see this happen again. It’s time for real changes to start getting implemented.


  1. You reported, that from 400 million segr. accounts
    a part of $ 225 million was verified with only $ 5 million
    (= $ 220 million vanished).
    But what is with the difference of $ 400 million to 225 million= about $ 175 million. Whrer are these funds?
    Are they verified to really exist or are they also vanished?

  2. That $175 mm or so is probably deposited at their clearing broker, Jeffries, or at the exchanges as margin requirements. That money is verified.

  3. […] PFGBest Update: Chapter 7 ( […]

  4. what is the potential of getting money back since it is not under protection scheme of SCIP? Thanks.

  5. There’s no way to tell yet- we have to wait for more information to come out of the bankruptcy proceedings regarding the split between assets and liabilities. We’re currently researching legal options on the matter, and will keep you informed.

  6. […] PFGBest Update: Chapter 7 jQuery(document).ready(function(){"",{ current_post_id: "18641" });"",{ ajax: "ajax" }); setInterval("updateOnlineStatus()", 50000); // Update every 50 seconds }); function updateOnlineStatus() {"",{ ajax: "ajax" }); } Twitter This Usuario: […]

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.