Why Commodities Give you an Ulcer (Index)?

New PictureOne of the many things we geek out about here at Attain, is the vast amount of opportunities available to crunch, dissect, and analyze the measure of risk each strategy offers. We’ve covered them all… Sharpe, Sortino, Mar & Calmar, Sterling (well almost all), and even reevaluated an alternative formula for Sortino. We’ve talked about ways to measure risk adjusted performance: how not all volatility is equal, and how it makes more sense to focus and care about the downside volatility more than the upside. Which led us to define and illustrate the two drawdown differences. Which leads us to perhaps one of the best named risk measurements out there: the Ulcer Index.

The Ulcer Index sort of pulls all of this together based on the theory that the pain an investor feels is not just how big, or how long, or how frequent losses are – but a combination of all of those factors. As such, the Ulcer Index measures the downside volatility, frequency of losses, magnitude of drawdown, and length of drawdown together into one number, measuring the overall pain an investor would have felt.

To provide a detailed explanation, we turn to Futures Magazine:

“The Ulcer Index…is calculated as the square root of the average squared drawdown number…

As can be seen by looking at the calculation, the Ulcer Index incorporates every single drawdown on every day of the history. A shallow drawdown that lasts a very long time will contribute a lot to the Ulcer Index because there will be a drawdown number for each of those days; a large drawdown will also be penalized a lot because of the squared factor…

The final number is a measure of the pain that was felt in the strategy over the period because it reflects all of the drawdown experience – not just the maximum drawdown but the frequency, magnitude and duration of drawdowns.”

Essentially, the Ulcer Index sort of normalizes the drawdown experience, where a small, but long drawdown may bring the same pain (have the same Ulcer Index number) as a big, but short drawdown. Like all such risk ratios – the numbers themselves don’t really mean anything, it’s how they relate to each other when measuring different performance profiles against one another.

For example, we calculated the Ulcer Index for the various asset classes in our monthly asset class scoreboard over the past 10 years (Sept. 2003 – Sept. 2013) to see how each lines up in terms of investor pain.

Ulcer Index Table(Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of futures results)
Sources: Managed Futures = Barclay CTA Index, Bonds = Barclay Aggregate Bond Index
Hedge Funds =DJCS Broad Hedge Fund Index, U.S. Stocks = S&P 500,
World Stocks = MSCI ACWI ex US, Real Estate =iShares DJ Real Estate ETF (IYR)
Commodities = DJ USB Commodities Index

It’s good to see that even thought managed futures is in its worst drawdown since its inception (both length and depth), it still remains near the top of list for least amount of investor pain. Conversely, the often volatile and susceptible to huge (and long) drawdown commodity market has an Ulcer Index (a pain number) 10 times that of managed futures, while stocks and real estate aren’t that much better. So enjoy those stock market all time highs while they last, but beware the pain that comes with them.


One comment

  1. Wow. You pulled this one out of the archive. Peter Matthews pitched this to me at MFA five years ago. Matthews co-founder of legendary CTA Mint had just launched a new CTA, PJM, based partially on his research into the ulcer index. Unfortunately, I do not think it survived as I can’t find it in any database. The idea was to remove trades with the most risk and only take those with the best risk/reward ratios. Perhaps he just couldn’t get any trade signals.

    Dan C

Write a Comment

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.