Rickety Rationale for Commodity Investing

It seems those articles calling for the death of commodity funds didn’t resonate with investors looking to get in on a possible uptrend in the commodity markets. Thirty-Three Billion in new money flowed into Commodity Exchange Products in 2016, the most since 2009, and it doesn’t look like investors are slowing down in 2017. According to RBC Capital Markets, investors poured $3.3 Billion into global commodity funds in January, bringing total AUM to $172.3 Billion.  It turns out investors did listen to op-ed’s like this one, calling on investors to “bulk up on commodities,” mainly on the idea that that we might see a resurgence in the commodity super-cycle in 2017.

A few things catching our eye here:

1. This is performance chasing writ large… The main interest for these flows is that the commodity indices were up last year. It’s usually shrouded in excuses like inflation hedges, but the interest would have been much more muted, if existent at all, had commodity markets posted another losing year in 2016. Will “commodities” push higher in 2017?  Who knows, but it’s not a market known for its persistence of returns, and even if it does push higher – it is a market known for its volatility of returns… meaning even if right on direction, it will be a risky and dangerous path to get there.


2. This is an Oil bet in disguise. Most of the commodity indices are heavily skewed towards the energy complex and Crude oil in particular, with the rest of the exposure mostly in metals.  So dream all you want of that field of Corn or Cotton and exposure to inflation in such  markets in places like South America or Australia. You’re not going to get any return from those markets in a ‘commodity index’ product unless Oil and Metals play along.  And if you’re basically just betting on Oil, there’s a lot better ways to do it than the inefficient access point of commodity index products.…  and one very bad way to do it named $USO.  See our breakdown here:

Commodity Exposure by ETF

3. A recurring theme among investors we speak with is a renewed interest in so called “commodity strategies.”  What do they mean by “commodity strategies?” Well, that’s where we scratch our head, too. You see, when you show up at a hedge fund conference looking to analyze and vet “commodity programs,” based on a renewed interest in commodities, based on the performance of the commodity indices last year  – it is sort of like you’re going to a sushi restaurant in Chicago because you heard the city has the best steak restaurants. Put simply, many investors are looking at commodity based absolute return products based on directional long only commodity performance. Hey, we’ll take the interest, and they’ll likely be better served for being in the world of risk controls and the ability to go short. But more than a few are likely to be confused and/or upset when and if commodity prices go on a tear higher and their absolute return program doesn’t keep pace. Conversely, they should be happy as clams if commodity prices reverse course and their absolute return strategy has the opposite sign in front of their annual number.

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, RCM's own estimates of performance based on account managed by advisors on its books, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.