Election Volatility is Here and More Intense Than Ever

October is a historically volatile month (see Oct 08, Oct 87), and the VIX tends to peak in the month, “jumping to [a level of] more than 21… on average over the past 30 years” (CNBC), where we even get the so called October effect or Mark Twain effect. And this October is a particularly interesting month of market fear because not only is it election year – it’s an election involving one of our most volatile U.S. President’s of all time – a certain Trump.

Here’s what that October weirdness looks like in the VIX Futures term structure (simply a plot of each futures contract month’s price, via vixcentral.com), with the market in steep contango going into the October expiration, and then reverting to backwardation from that month onward – although the entire curve is higher than the front month and current spot prices.


Why October?
First, why is VIX higher in October? Isn’t the election in November? It surely is, but the VIX is designed to measure the expected volatility of the S&P 500 over the next 30 days, as reflected in option prices looking out between 27 and 34 days.

So, it is reflecting people pricing in higher volatility over the election period. BUT,  if you’re trading the actual election itself, the November VIX futures will be the only thing you can trade – the October contract will have stopped trading. So while the October futures do cover the election period, you can be sure there will be those placing their bets in the November futures as well when the time comes.


A Contested Election?
This all makes some sense. There’s an election. There’s uncertainty about whether Democrats in the U.S. take the Presidency, the Senate, and more all the way down through state races. A lot of changes in leadership can cause new rules, new regulations, etc. – which can impact company earnings and therefore stock prices. That’s all rather textbook.

What isn’t so textbook, is the idea that this more than usual increase in forward volatility is also due in some part to the possibility of a contested election. Yes, here in the United States of America where we invented the concept of elections not being contested.

Here was Matt Thompson on our recent podcast covering the current Vol environment:

…everything kind of centers around that October contract. The October VIX contract looks 30 days forward – that covers the election volatility….after October you get this big slow back down. It’s obvious that the market is pricing in some volatility around the election. Look at it, you’re 28 today in the March contract into next spring, so that VIX market is looking at major volatility around the election that persists for a long time. Some of these scenarios people are drawing up where we’re not going to have a clear [presidential] winner for who knows how long. And that seems to be what’s being priced in right now.” (Matt Thompson)

Now, we argued there’s also some pandemic/vaccine/etc. lasting vol or vol echo from March, but it is for sure interesting. So interesting, that one of the kings of Vol himself, Chris Cole of Artemis Capital Management, weighed in via (Twitter). Now, Chris is saying the same thing about a contested election – but in a very different way. He’s arguing that the prospect of a prolonged, contested election is NOT priced in.

“Vol markets value the U.S. election as a massive binary risk event that occurs at one point-in-time (like earnings in a stock). The real risk is a contested election and US constitutional crisis that occurs throughout time. If the latter comes to pass, forward vol is very mispriced.” (Twitter)

Is the probability of a contested election properly priced in? Who knows. Only time will tell, and only the degree and length of any such contesting will tell. Our bet is that most all of it is priced into October, and then some of it priced into the back months as a bit of a hedge.


Speaking of Binary Events
We talked about being “beware of binary events” in our 2020 MF Outlook – specifically why politics and systematic trading don’t mix.  So, we hope it isn’t some sharp whipsaw move the other direction based on the election results, as that’s particularly not good for systematic strategies. Systematic trading relies on defined rules and extended shifts to new paradigms. This election season is shaping up to be the ultimate black swan event – except for the fact that you know it’s coming, so more of a Gray Rhino. Talk about a systematic trader tease of the highest proportion. There’s no way to write in rules for a November election that could drag into ??/??/2021. Here’s how we put it in the 2020 Outlook:

The run up [to an election or new law vote] is about investors positioning their portfolios for what may come. It’s people lightening up on exposure, adding safety, and so forth. When enough people do that sort of thing at the same time – you get a mini rush for the exits that can push prices in a certain direction for a certain amount of time. What we in the business call a trend, or momentum. We love these – they’re measurable, cyclical, capturable.

But, what happens on the day the vote is tallied is something different altogether. The vote itself is a binary event. It either passes or it doesn’t. If it passes, x, y and z happen in markets. If it doesn’t, a, b, and c happen in markets. You may be familiar with another popular binary event, the coin flip. Heads – you win, Tails – you lose. Suffice to say that the guys and girls with PhDs and sophisticated algorithms for tracking market prices and identifying patterns don’t quite like their life’s work boiling down to a coin flip.  These binary events and resulting short term moves can temporarily invalidate all of the math and research which go into the modern day systematic global macro or managed futures program.

Election volatility is not a new concept – but how exactly that volatility plays out is going to swing trades one way or the other. Binary or not – this could be something of history in the making.

The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.

The programs listed here are a sub-set of the full list of programs able to be accessed by subscribing to the database and reflect programs we currently work with and/or are more familiar with.

Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history. Individuals cannot invest in the index itself, and actual rates of return may be significantly different and more volatile than those of the index.

Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.

Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.

Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.

RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.

Limitations on RCM Quintile + Star Rankings

The Quintile Rankings and RCM Star Rankings shown here are provided for informational purposes only. RCM does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of this information. The ranking methodology is proprietary and the results have not been audited or verified by an independent third party. Some CTAs may employ trading programs or strategies that are riskier than others. CTAs may manage customer accounts differently than their model results shown or make different trades in actual customer accounts versus their own accounts. Different CTAs are subject to different market conditions and risks that can significantly impact actual results. RCM and its affiliates receive compensation from some of the rated CTAs. Investors should perform their own due diligence before investing with any CTA. This ranking information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.

See the full terms of use and risk disclaimer here.